Quantity of Troops increase, casualty’s go Down.

14 03 2007

Fatality rates for US solders has gone down 60% over the last month. What are we now doing right, to deserve such good fortune? We are putting more solders into areas like Al-Sadr city. We are starting to realy fight this war.

Instead of the Rumsfeld doctrine of using just enough solders to loose this war, we are putting down enough troops to keep the killers from messing with us. And attacks against strongholds north of Bagdad have curbed them shooting at our helicopters.

Now if the Liberals Mentally ill can get it though their heads that the only “new direction” we need is victory, we might do good. this is the first thing done right since the end of hostility’s. Can we do this? we had better.

The View From Out Here


If it quacks like a terrorist…

13 03 2007

For those of you who haven’t heard it yet. The 6 imams that got removed of a USAir flight for public safety reasons, are going to sue Today. After being told by CAIR that they are victims of discrimination, they are going to tie up our courts with this stupid suite.

My wish is that this doesn’t pass a laugh test. But, were talking about Minnesota here. Most of the residents are Mondale, Humphrey types

To review what happened last November. People complained to the flight crew and police the following.

  1. They prayed “very loudly” if you want to pray be my guest. Discretion is always a good idea though.
  2. They were chanting allah, allah, allah. see my comment above.
  3. 3 people had one way tickets and no luggage. normally people that fly are going or coming to some place and need a change of clothes. unless your not planning on living through the flight.
  4. All 6 were described as skinny but asked for seat belt extensions. Did they have body image problems or wanted us fat Americans to feel bad?
  5. They were overheard saying what a good guy sadam hussain was and dissing America. Have some respect for the country thats putting up with your sorry carcases.
  6. They were not sitting together as you would expect they broke into groups of 2 in 3 sections. easier to take control that way

While one of these by them self wouldn’t justify suspicion, I say that together it is just cause to remove them. At best these guys were stupid. Maybe they thought that they could just say they were joking. Maybe they wanted to see what they could get away with. It probably was a dry run. If not then they were trying to get pitched so they could file this suite.

What is needed is proof that this was all a set up by CAIR. They will scream on how prejudiced we are. That we discriminated against them because they are muslim. NO

They acted like terrorists. In America we have a saying. If you look like a duck, act like a duck and quack like a duck. YOU ARE A DUCK. 6 men made 6 quacks. They were behaving and acting like terrorists. Guess what? We think they are terrorists.

muslims are not terrorists, most terrorists are muslim.

The View From Out Here

Some people can’t take criticism

10 03 2007

Who would have thought that some people can’t handle Glenn Beck.. Oh yeah, were talking about Liberals here right?

I read over at Your 2 Sense that Libs have a new disease that causes obsessive hate toward the self proclaimed “sick freak”.

This really doesn’t surprise me. Liberal thinkers hate to get Clue-batted. They hate worse to get Clue-batted while being made fun of. Now in addition to all that, add to it the fact that some of it is happening on CNN-HN, which is liberal home turf. I guess it is too much for those moon-bats to handle.

What do they want? Truth doesn’t taste very good going down. Idiots.

Who are some of the most hated people today? Conservatives that use logic and whit. Some examples are..

My favorate blogger Emporor Misha I
Writer’s, Columnist’s and TV pundits Michelle Malken and Ann Coulter.
Radio personality Michael Savage.

Come on let me hear about it. Am I right or am i wrong.

The View From Out Here!

The Czech President agrees with me!

10 03 2007

Well, those of you who read my blog, will find this interesting.

Environmentalism is a Religion that is based more on political ambitions than science, the president of the Czech Republic warned Friday

I think this sounds familiar. Oh yeah I wrote that last Sunday. see Here This is realy great. I hope he doesn’t get in trouble, with the disciples of gore, for reading my blog. I just would like some credit.


The View From Out Here!

Should CAIR be prosecuted under the RICO act?

10 03 2007

I found this over at INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY

The first Secular Islam Summit was a success if for no other reason than it intimidated the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the PR machine of militant Islam.

Now this is a Business Magazine, not your run of the mill bomb thower. But i guess TRUTH IS TRUTH!

It dispatched its henchmen to Florida to shout the reformers down at their confab earlier this week.

CAIR also posted on its Web site no fewer than four stories bashing the event and its courageous speakers, many of whom are women calling for an end to inequality and mistreatment under radical Islam.

CAIR declared the summit illegitimate because few of the participants are ‘practicing Muslims,’ and those who are, it claims, are merely pawns playing into the hands of ‘Islamophobes.’

In order to have legitimate reform, you need to have the right messengers,’ asserted CAIR spokesman Ahmed Bedier.

Right messengers… I get it, like all animals are equal, but some are MORE equal than others. This jerk mouth piece is so smug he doesn’t see himself gaging on his double speek.

And who might that be? The four CAIR executives who have been successfully prosecuted on terrorism-related charges? The CAIR co-founder who said the Quran should replace the U.S. Constitution as ‘the highest authority in America’?

Personal note here. NOT ON MY WATCH!

True voices of moderation are the delegates to the Secular Islam Summit, who insisted in their declaration that mosque and state should always be separate. They also called for tolerance for non-Muslims, and an end to violent jihad. CAIR should take notes.

So what if many of them are ex-Muslims? They risked their lives to leave Islam and now dare to openly criticize an ideology that everyone else is afraid to criticize.

What these brave souls have to say carries far more weight than anything said by CAIR, which couldn’t even bring itself to condemn Osama bin Laden in the wake of 9/11.

This again is from a Business Mag. You what? if they would have stayed put they would have probably been dead by now!

Fittingly, CAIR’s Bedier balked when summit delegate Tawfik Hamid, a former terrorist, challenged him to denounce Saudi sharia law for ‘killing apostates, beating women and stoning women.’

This is not about Saudi Arabia,’ he huffed. ‘We condemn any nation that misuses Islam, but we’re not going to condemn an entire nation. That’s like condemning London (sic).’

Another CAIR sugar daddy is the ruler of Dubai, which acted as the staging ground for the hijackers and the transit point for 9/11 cash.

Sheikh Mohammed, who before 9/11 requisitioned cargo jets to supply Osama bin Laden’s Afghan camps, owns CAIR’s D.C. headquarters through his foundation, which also holds telethons for Palestinian ‘martyrs.’

The same foundation recently pledged $50 million to CAIR to boost its operations, which includes a legal shop set up to intimidate critics with vexatious lawsuits.

Radical groups like CAIR have been on the offensive, primarily because counterattacks by moderates have been few and far between.

But the Secular Islam Summit offers a ray of hope. Just a handful of reformers gathered in Florida made CAIR squirm. Imagine if hundreds of moderate Muslim voices rose up and challenged the Saudi-backed Wahhabi lobby.

I have to say that this is the more of the same old I’m better than you so dont criticise me. I heard Hannity talk about the Muslim summit and wondered what he was talking about. Now we all know.

Does CAIR qualify for a RICO lawsuite?

  1. They advocate the elimination of our constitution in favor of sharia law
  2. They harras opponetes with frivolous lawsuites intended to delay exposing their fraud.
  3. They claim to be the only ones able to criticise those who they actualy represent.
  4. They say you should do what we tell you or we won’t be responible for what the uncontrolable masses will do. and again I state that they are bought and paid for by the Islamic Supremacists.

That would be a big YES!


The View From Out Here

3 GOP’s cave

4 03 2007

Well here we are. The big 3 Romney, McCain, and Rudy said Ann was bad. the following was from NYTimes via Drudge

Three of the leading Republican presidential candidates on Saturday denounced one of their party’s best-known conservative commentators for using an antigay epithet when discussing a Democratic presidential contender at a gathering of conservatives here.The remarks by Ann Coulter, an author who regularly speaks at conservative events, were sharply denounced by the candidates, Senator John McCain of Arizona, Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. Their statements came after Democrats, gay rights groups and bloggers raised a storm of protest over the remarks.

Gee no one was mad on any blogs I’ve been on. Heck, some of them want to sell Ann some insult offsets!

Mr. Edwards’s aides responded with an e-mail message that attacked Ms. Coulter and urged supporters to donate to Mr. Edwards’s campaign. “John was singled out for a personal attack because the Republican establishment knows he poses the greatest threat to their power,” said his campaign manager, David E. Bonior. “Since they have nothing real to use against him, Coulter’s resorting to the classic right-wing strategy of riling up hate to smear a progressive socialist champion.”

OK I’ll give you Ann should have just stuck with the facts and made them call her every nasty thing in the book but WE all know Liberals Can say anything about white Christians and not get called on it. Ann still has a sense of humor about it.

Ms. Coulter, asked for a reaction to the Republican criticism, said in an e-mail message: “C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean.”

So instead of standing up and saying She was making a joke and pointing out Dean & Co. have said a lot worse (google it) they wimped out. Oh will i be in trouble now for calling the big 3 wimp’s we are a year from the primary season and they are so afraid of the MSM they are caving. Whats next Thought reeducation for all conservatives? What will they make them cave on next? Universal Health care? Global Warming? Elimination of all guns?

We need some one who will lead and the big 3 ain’t it. I’ll throw out 3 good names. Tom Tancredo, Michael Savage and Ann Coulter. Yes I said Ann. Three REAL conservatives. Strong on boarders, defense and taking care of America. If you agree say so. if you think I’m a conservative moon-bat tell me. use the comments

Beware the most intolerant religion alive today!

3 03 2007

   No, not the radical Islamist who wants to kill those who don’t submit to the will of allah. I’m talking about the religion that doesn’t want its words questioned. The high and powerful church of global warming. Its high priest is Al Gore who won’t talk to you unless you say he is right. It’s reported here that journalist should not be balanced in their reporting of global warming. He states that “Balance as bias” is keeping people from following his message of stopping global warming.

   You know this makes me look back in history to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The major religion of Europe was Roman Catholicism. And it was intertwined with the governments and got full of its self and corrupt, would threaten any one who dared speak something against it. And along comes this guy Copernicus and said that the earth is not the center of the universe. Then in the early sixteen hundreds her came Galileo Galilei giving empirical evidence to this and they threatend him. They forced him to recant and burned his books.

      So, some one please tell me the diffrence? Where people wont discuss anything unless you accept their side of the argument. Because they are so right? No. its because they are so self rightous that they are mentialy ill. A society that will not accept discusion is totalitarian, and that is not America. 


The View From Out Here